OPTIFLEET · Right Ship | Right ServiceAI · MILP · Time Series · ML

The right cargo.
The right voyage.

OptiFleet assigns every vessel to the voyage that earns the most.

Liner scheduling has more moving pieces than any human can hold in their head. OptiFleet weighs every variable in your network — cargo mix, vessel costs, port rotations, forecasted demand — and returns the single most profitable deployment. Vessel utilization goes up. Revenue per voyage goes up. Bunker savings come along as a subset of the same answer.

15–20%
Vessel opex reduction
White paper
8–12%
Vessel utilization gain
White paper
25–30%
Schedule reliability uplift
White paper
Minutes
Planning that took days
COO quote

The difference

Most platforms handle one dimension. OptiFleet handles seven.

Single-dimension optimizers leave money on the table — the right cargo on the wrong vessel, the right vessel on the wrong rotation. OptiFleet resolves all seven dimensions in a unified model so every decision flows through the same math.

01Service
02Ports
03Cargo
04Vessel
05Container Type
06Routing
07Emissions
All resolved together →

What this means for your P&L

Maximum revenue per voyage

Right cargo mix on the right vessel on the right voyage. Every slot allocated to the cargo that contributes most — by container type, weight, and freight rate.

Full vessel utilization

Cargo allocation, port-pair assignment and deployment planned together. Idle slots become incremental margin, not rounding error.

Disruption recovery in seconds

Port congestion, strikes, breakdowns. OptiFleet rebuilds your deployment before your team finishes their first call.

Bunker savings as a by-product

The cost optimization falls out of the cargo and route decision — eco-speed routing, hull and propeller cleaning, and route-network planning all factored in alongside revenue.

Six months in · One real case

Numbers from the field.

A medium-sized regional shipping line operating across Southeast Asia, the Middle East and Africa deployed OptiFleet. Six months in, ROI was under one year. Below: the verified deltas, anonymized at the customer's request.

−18%
Vessel operating costs
+13%
Vessel utilization
+15%
Schedule reliability
−12%
Empty container repo costs
via OptiBox
−4%
Fuel + emissions
by-product of routing
What once took days of planning now happens in minutes, and we consistently find better solutions than our previous best practices. Most importantly, we can now make truly integrated decisions across commercial and operational dimensions.
Chief Operating Officer · Regional shipping line (name withheld at customer request)

Why this exists

The pressures every liner is feeling right now.

OptiFleet is built around the five structural challenges shaping container shipping in this cycle.

Underutilized cargo capacity

Many vessels sail with empty slots. Inefficient cargo allocation leaves margin on the dock — every voyage.

Rising operational costs

Fuel prices and freight rates swing faster than spreadsheets update. Per-slot economics erode silently.

Vessel scheduling complexity

Suboptimal deployment compounds with port congestion. Service reliability suffers; customer trust follows.

Carbon emission compliance

Global emissions policies demand optimized scheduling and bunker procurement, not heroic last-minute speed cuts.

Regulatory complexity + manual workflows

Different regions, ever-changing rules, manual documentation. Compliance gaps become operational risk.

One published case · Fleet & Network white paper

0

Variables in the optimization problem for a real liner — 60 ships, 1,500 port pairs, 10 commodities, 6 equipment types — per Solverminds' published Fleet & Network Optimization paper. Your fleet scales it up or down accordingly. Manual planning can hold a few dozen variables in mind. OptiFleet solves the full case in seconds.

1,500

Port pairs

Origin → destination combos

60

Ships

500–4,000 TEU vessels

10

Commodity types

Per-shipment cargo class

6

Equipment types

20DC, 40DC, 40HC, RF, OT, FR

Daily

Demand swings

Per-port fluctuating volume

Multi

Discharge ports

Per-voyage discharge mix

Varying

Depth restrictions

Draft & berth limits

Global

Equipment moves

Surplus / deficit balance

Disruption planning

Port congested? Schedule rebuilt in seconds.

When ports congest, vessels can sit for 10–15 days. OptiFleet redirects the rotation around the bottleneck — your vessel keeps earning, your customers keep their cargo flow.

Days recovered

4

Per disrupted port call · illustrative scenario. Per the TANKER white paper, "the majority of cost saving accrues from rescheduling vessels after disruption" — the same applies on the container side.

D1
D2
D3
D4
D5
D6
D7

Without OptiFleet — port congestion

SIN
4-day wait
DXB

With OptiFleet — re-routed

SIN
PEN
CMB
AUH
DXB

What's inside

Nine capabilities. One optimizer.

Variable ingestion

Every variable. Every voyage.

Port rotations, vessel speeds, terminal productivity, port stay, sea time, service frequency — all weighted before a schedule is generated.

Vessel financial footprint

Hire, ports, canals, fuel — per leg.

Every cost line on every leg: charter hire, port and canal costs, insurance, maintenance, and max-speed vs eco-speed fuel. Bunker savings fall out of the same model — not the headline objective.

Yield maximization

Highest revenue per ton-mile.

Identifies optimal port-pair allocation by container type, weight, and freight contribution. Selects the most affordable vessel for the strongest revenue.

MILP + ML forecasting

Math + machine learning.

Mixed Integer Linear Programming solves the constraint problem; ML drives time-series demand forecasts for every port pair. Your plan reflects tomorrow's market, not yesterday's.

CII + emissions tracking

ESG built into the plan.

Carbon Intensity Indicator (g/t-nm) computed per voyage and per port leg. Regulatory benchmarks live inside the optimization, not bolted on after.

Slot-sharing cost allocation

VSAs, JVs, slot swaps modeled.

Ownership ratios, slot contributions, per-category cost splits — charter, fuel, port, canal, vessel OC. Transparent, fair, finally profitable for both parties.

Disruption planning

Rebuild schedules in seconds.

Port congestion, strikes, vessel breakdowns — OptiFleet generates a revised, data-backed schedule in seconds instead of days.

Coordinated with OptiBox

Empties planned where it matters.

Empty container repositioning is OptiBox's territory — OptiFleet shares deployment context with it so commercial and empty plans align.

API-native integration

No migration. No swap-out.

Connects to existing client applications via API services. Results displayed graphically — financial, commercial, and operational plans at a glance.

The 5-step approach

From pro forma to production, on one cloud platform.

01

Plan

Pro forma schedule submitted to OptiFleet for optimization.

02

Connect

Cloud-based platform ingests via API services — no migration.

03

Analyze

Bin-Packing + Network Flow models run across every variable.

04

Optimize

Multi-objective profit maximization — cargo, capacity, revenue.

05

Apply

Approved schedule applied to live production. Repeats daily.

What lands on your desk

Four decision-ready plans.
Every run. Every morning.

Output 01

Financial profitability

  • Total profit for the month
  • Profit by service and vessel
  • Total contribution for the trade lane
  • Total vessel-repositioning cost

Output 02

Commercial plan

  • Which port pairs are profitable to chase
  • Which customers / contracts to prioritize
  • Yield per ton-mile by lane and container type

Output 03

Operational plan

  • The exact schedule with port-call sequence
  • Speed profile per leg — eco vs max
  • Best vessel deployment by lane, weight, depth
  • Port and canal cost projection

Output 04

Cargo allocation plan

  • Right cargo mix per vessel per voyage
  • Port-pair allocation by container type, weight, freight
  • DG-segregated cargo planning
  • Hands off to OptiBox for empty container repositioning

What it does in practice

Five real use cases.

Each one corresponds to a screen in the platform — the things planners actually do, every day, on OptiFleet.

Use case 01 · Vessel comparison

Maximizing profitability through vessel comparison.

Run side-by-side simulations of vessels on the same service. Charter hire, fuel at sea and port, canals, ports, slot costs — every line item compared. The winner isn't always the bigger ship.

SVM GLOBEPick
Capacity5,500 TEUS
Total costUSD 2,762,929
ProfitUSD 3,805,262
SVM OSCAR
Capacity6,078 TEUS
Total costUSD 2,797,926
ProfitUSD 3,770,265

Smaller ship, lower charter+fuel, higher profit — the call spreadsheets miss.

Use case 02 · Port-level utilization

Unlocking revenue with port-level utilization insights.

Granular visibility into TEU fill, weight, high-cube and reefer utilization at every port across the rotation. Spots unused capacity — and where to sell it.

PortTEU%WT%HC%Total TEU
CNSHA99.583.734.62,964
CNNGB94.973.834.31,150
CNSKU10078.638.32,220
VNTCT97.878.636.41,820
SGSIN84.157.640.41,340
MYPKG80.457.734.7618

Verified table from a real OptiFleet rotation · TEU/WT/HC fill rates per port.

Use case 03 · Slot sharing

Streamlining cost allocation in vessel slot sharing.

VSA partners. Ownership ratios. Different cost splits per category. OptiFleet models the whole arrangement — transparent, fair, and finally profitable for both parties.

SVM (owned)GLB (3rd party)
Slots40/60
Charter hire40/60
Fuel cost50/50
Port cost35/65
Canal cost20/80
Vessel OC40/60

Use case 04 · Carbon intelligence

Driving sustainable operations with CII tracking.

Carbon Intensity Indicator (g/t-nm) computed per voyage and per port leg. ESG goals and regulatory benchmarks built into the planning loop — not bolted on after.

Voyage CII

10.56

g/t-nm

CNSHA
29.59
CNSKU
8.89
VNTCT
10.76
SGSIN
21.11
MYPKG
11.73

Use case 05 · Feeder optimization

Powering agile operations with feeder vessel optimization.

Slot sales, slot purchases, joint ventures, slot swaps — third-party bookings integrated with own-vessel planning. Commercial flexibility without losing operational rigor.

Slot swaps
Slot sales
Joint ventures
3rd-party bookings

The P&L report

Six categories. One trade result.

Commercial teams assess costs, optimize revenue and refine operations using historical and forecasted data. The P&L report folds every cost line into a single liner-contribution number.

01

Revenue

Earnings from freight, surcharges and demurrage.

02

Handling & operational costs

Load / discharge handling, transshipment, agency fees.

03

Equipment costs

Container maintenance, equipment repositioning expenses.

04

Ship operating costs

Charter hire, port, canal and fuel.

05

Slot costs

Internal and external slot allocation expenses.

06

Profitability

Liner contribution and final trade result.

Real service · CSA — China · Singapore · Jebel Ali

What an OptiFleet-generated rotation looks like.

Nine ports, 42 days, 11,092 nautical miles — the full rotation generated, scheduled and cost-modelled in a single run. Diagram shows the outbound leg, with port spacing proportional to actual nautical miles between calls.

CSA-EXAMPLE · OUTBOUND · CHINA → SE ASIA → MIDDLE EASTSPACING ∝ NM BETWEEN PORTS · BAR HEIGHT ∝ PORT STAY DAYS235 nmi769 nmi880 nmi639 nmi330 nmi3,270 nmi330 nmi100 nmiCNSHAShanghai1.17 DCNNGBNingbo0.79 DCNSKUShekou0.63 DVNTCTCai Mep0.46 DSGSINSingapore0.75 DMYPKGPt Klang0.75 DAEJEAJebel Ali1.46 DSADMNDammam1.25 DQAHMDHamad0.79 DDAY 0~DAY 25

42

Voyage days

11,092 nmi

Distance

15.43 kt

Avg speed

30.02 D

Sea time

10.00 D

Port stay

2.00 D

Manoeuvering

90+

Countries

Leading shipping lines running OptiFleet across global trade lanes.

20+

Years experience

Maritime domain expertise behind OptiFleet — per the white paper.

<1 yr

Time to ROI

Payback period in the verified Southeast Asia / Middle East / Africa case study.

7

Dimensions optimized

Service · Ports · Cargo · Vessel · Container type · Routing · Emissions.